Is radio carbon dating accurate

Rated 4.96/5 based on 860 customer reviews

Most concerning, though, is when the carbon dating directly opposes or contradicts other estimates.

At this point, the carbon dating data is simply disregarded.

All living things absorb both types of carbon; but once it dies, it will stop absorbing.

The C-12 is a very stable element and will not change form after being absorbed; however, C-14 is highly unstable and in fact will immediately begin changing after absorption.

It has been summed up most succinctly in the words of American neuroscience Professor Bruce Brew: that samples of moss could be brought back to life after being frozen in ice. That carbon dating deemed the moss to have been frozen for over 1,500 years.

Now, if this carbon dating agrees with other evolutionary methods of determining age, the team could have a real discovery on their hands.

Equilibrium is the name given to the point when the rate of carbon production and carbon decay are equal.

By measuring the rate of production and of decay (both eminently quantifiable), scientists were able to estimate that carbon in the atmosphere would go from zero to equilibrium in 30,000 – 50,000 years.

Obviously, this works only for things which were once living.

At least to the uninitiated, carbon dating is generally assumed to be a sure-fire way to predict the age of any organism that once lived on our planet.

Without understanding the mechanics of it, we put our blind faith in the words of scientists, who assure us that carbon dating is a reliable method of determining the ages of almost everything around us.

C) dating usually want to know about the radiometric[1] dating methods that are claimed to give millions and billions of years—carbon dating can only give thousands of years.

People wonder how millions of years could be squeezed into the biblical account of history. Christians, by definition, take the statements of Jesus Christ seriously.

Leave a Reply